deletions | additions       diff --git a/If_you_wait_to_do__.tex b/If_you_wait_to_do__.tex  index 4b392b5..890e244 100644  --- a/If_you_wait_to_do__.tex  +++ b/If_you_wait_to_do__.tex 
...
Chapter II continues with a discussion on further attempts to incorporate spatial effects into establishments location choice models. It highlights the fact that, whenever a distance metric has been used in the weight matrix to implement a spatial aspect into the establishments location models (see the research of Dube et al., 2016; Bhat et al., 2014; Liviano-Solis and Arauzo-Carod, 2013; Lambert et al., 2010; and Klier and McMillen, 2008), the Euclidean distance was employed. The debate in this chapter demonstrates that there are insights to be gained by mindfully reconsidering and measuring distance depending on a given problem, such as a high congestion, speed limits, or physical uncrossable barriers which can diminish or totally eliminate the linkage between neighboring areas. Alternative distance metrices can be proposed and tested. Several studies, such as articles, including  the ones by Miller (2004, 2003) and the sudies by  Combes and Lafourcade (2005), Graham (2007), Duran-Fernandez and Santos (2014), Weisbrod (2008), Faber (2014),or  Kwon (2002) (2002), Boscoe et al. (2012), Chalasani et al. (2005), or Rietveld et al. (1999)  encourage the use of real distance metric based on the transport network over geographical distance metrics. %Several studies, such as the ones by Bodsen and Peeters (1975), Aten (1997), Duran-Fernandez and Santos (2014), Conley and Ligon (2002), Slade (2005), Le Gallo and Dall'erba (2008), and Fingleton (2008) have considered metrics not purely based on topography, including network distances and transport costs.  
...
%xxx Yet, following the remarks of Miller (2004) and Miller (2003) and other authors, that due to xxx,   concerns xxx, starting with X and X et al. on entry games and competition.