this is for holding javascript data
Alec Aivazis edited Introduction.tex
almost 10 years ago
Commit id: 5ea0874ebf5f5bba936bfa5eb59ce840b714343e
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Introduction.tex b/Introduction.tex
index 22698c1..507492f 100644
--- a/Introduction.tex
+++ b/Introduction.tex
...
In 1934, When the parts of the standard model were first being pieced together, Enrico Fermi introduced a particle called a neutrino that is fermionic in nature and does not ineract with baryonic matter, in order to explain how beta decay could convserve fundamental quantities (energy, spin, etc.) \cite{Wilson_1968} . For awhile, only electron neutrinos were thought to exist. However, fifty years later in 1988, Lederman, Schwartz, and Steinberger earned the Nobel Prize in physics for work they did in 1962 at the Alternating Gradient Synchotron at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. In their paper, the group from Columbia reported that they had found a second kind of neutrino that did not couple to the electron like the one proposed by Fermi, but instead to muons produced by their beam in upstate New York \cite{Danby_1962} . Another forty years passed before the third generation of neutrino was dicovered in 2000 by the DONUT collaboration at Fermilab near Chicago, Illinois \cite{Kodama_2001} .
\subsection{Neutrino Oscillations}
In 1958, Bruno Pontecorvo, an assistant of Enrico Fermi, suggested that if neutrinos did in fact have a mass (unlike what Fermi suggested) then the neutrinos we encounter might be a particle mixture of more fundamental mass states. Consequently, Pontecorvo argued, there is some probability of transitioning between neutrino and its associated anti-neutrino.
(CITE PONTECORVO PAPER Sov.Phys.JETP 7 (1958) 172-173 ).