deletions | additions
diff --git a/Introduction_Open_Science_is_understood__.html b/Introduction_Open_Science_is_understood__.html
index d3530cb..2847e89 100644
--- a/Introduction_Open_Science_is_understood__.html
+++ b/Introduction_Open_Science_is_understood__.html
...
Introduction
Open Science is understood as open
access acces to
all scientific
information, information with its products, such as literature, data and software.
Benefits This emerging paradigm shift also includes ideas about the future of
Open Science sciences within the digital age itself and changes in a scholarly value-added process. Benefits are for instance faster communication of research findings
- also through a more intensive collaboration between scientists - and
a higher visibility in the research community (
Arbeitsgruppe Open Access der Schwerpunktinitiative Digitale Information der Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen; Fournier 2012),
an effective quality control and long-term availability of research
data. outputs. The Concordat On Open Research Data
href="http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/opendata/" target="_blank">(2015) href="http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/opendata/">(2015) mentions "economic growth, increased resource efficiency, securing public support for research funding and
increasing public trust in research" as further
benefits.
Benefits benefits.
All together they differ according to three different benefit groups as shown in table 1. Researchers are individuals who might respond more to reasons like higher citation rates (
...
adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ASPC..461..763H},
adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},
}
" data-bib-key="Henneken_2012" contenteditable="false">Henneken 2012, Piwowar); representatives of
whole research institutions like library staff and presidents might consider also more collective benefits. Open Access is not an aim in itself but should be a means to improve science, enhance transparency and integrity.
- researchers: Findings are openly distributed and are accessible to anyone, this means easier distribution of research results, easier collaboration due to open data
- scientific institutions: Preservation and availability of research results inspite of highly mobile scientists
- science: anyone can participate, findings are shared and distributed broadly, less duplicate studies saves money, better reproducability which makes science better
...
Groups of benefit from personal to collective benefits| Individual researcher |
better reproducability |
At the moment, the currency of science are papers in highly ranked journals, therefore they are properly archived/stored (Kann man hier von Archiv sprechen?). But science consists of more than papers and the current practice of focus on quantity (in addition to quality?/ same researchers need to write more and in addition review more) is not sustainable.
