Authorea

Jana Rumler edited Publishing_financing_and_monitoring_Open__.html over 8 years ago

Commit id: ba19c714b6ffe7f07fc27405a15a0d49fbc50a5e

deletions | additions

Publishing, financing and monitoring Open Access

ZALF library - splitted into libary services and publication management - consults ZALF's adminitration administration and researchers in terms of publishing, financing and monitoring.

[While the dpt. of LIS manages internal information infrastructure..]

Since infrastructure..]

13-15 % of peer-reviewed journal articles are OA (percentage is constant, inspite of increasing the number of publications with around 200 articels per year)

Since July, 2015, ZALF supports an Open Access policy which is based on a template of the Leibniz Association.

Finances Association (http://www.zalf.de/en/forschung/services/pubman/Documents/Policy_eng_A9R378A.pdf). ZALF "recommends" and "obligates" specific points [which] that also combines formulation of own guidelines e.g. in addition to signing contracts with publishing companies (with a focus on German usage rights).

Finances concerning individual and consortia licences

Publication funds (central at ZALF, from 2016 1 year trial within Leibniz Association, link...)

Prepay membership within Leibniz Association = heavy discussion about licences between research institutions and publisher companies; Max Planck Society with Springer deal [citation discussion started by Swiss? librarian Gutknecht...]

LRLR (ends with 2015)

Open peer review in examples (platforms, journals etc.)

Observation/Monitoring of growing awareness concerning change in used publication types e.g. IOP maths? with video abstracts

Monitoring/Reporting

using abstracts

Monitoring/Reporting

using bibliometric methods and (licenced) data from data bases like Web of Science and Scopus

Leibniz working groups (Leibniz libraries, Open Access, Research Data) establish a discussion culture about ongoing issues related to the future of OA publishing.

Especially central finacing is delicate when stakeholders need to decide which criteria (responsible institution which administrates the workflows between Leibniz institutions and the researcher himself) are needed for decision making in terms of green and gold OA.

Also

OA.