deletions | additions       diff --git a/Future_of_Open_ScienceOvercoming_barrierssThe__.html b/Future_of_Open_ScienceOvercoming_barrierssThe__.html  index c6a0ecd..8251282 100644  --- a/Future_of_Open_ScienceOvercoming_barrierssThe__.html  +++ b/Future_of_Open_ScienceOvercoming_barrierssThe__.html 
...
journal = {Information - Wissenschaft {\&} Praxis},  }  " data-bib-key="Brembs_2015" contenteditable="false">Brembs 2015 states  that there exist no technical problems to practice Open Science, including a digital infrastructure. However, there is no one-fits-all technical solution for all institutions. Integrating the long tail of science can be time consuming and needs technical skills. Instead of relying on institutional repositories, small institutions could offer their research output on external platforms. But who knows which platforms will still exist in a few years? Having an institutional repository feels safer from an institutional perspective. But one needs to consider that inforation needs to be refound, therefore the future of Open Science points directly to registration of research results. Scientific articles have been registered for  a

Openness long time, nowadays we register data, presentaions and teaching material on platforms like zenodo.

Openness  concerning research data is supported by the global initiative Research Data   Alliance. It responds to the increasing importance of data in the   scientific landscape from a bottom-up approach (