Paul Wright edited untitled.html  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 029c4d612530dd9541d0619e53122bef3aed7bdb

deletions | additions      

       

Double-click this text 
Spatial Distribution of EBSAs 
Figure shows the boundaries of the EBSAs defined by the Commission for Biological Diversity. These are defined as 'geographically or oceanographically discrete areas that provide important services  to start writing.
 one or more species/populations of an ecosystem or to the ecosystem as a whole, compared to other surrounding areas or areas of similar ecological characteristics, or otherwise meet the [EBSA] criteria' , and, with such large overarching criteria, it is clear that their spatial extent and number are significant. EBSAs number in excess of 290 worldwide, accounting for some 2.2 x \(10^{13}\) \(km^2\)of ocean and coastal waters. 

Spatial Distribution of PSSAs 
Figure shows the spatial extent for the 13 PSSAs presently agreed by the IMO. Boundaries for three (check) further putative PSSAs have not been included, due t lack of accurate geo-referenced data. These areas are significantly less in number and extent, accounting for some 5.3.x \(10^6\) \(km^2\)of ocean and coastal waters. 

Spatial distribution of the overlap between the two areas of designation 
Figures highlight the major area of overlap between EBSAs and PSSAs. The total area of overlap represents some 3% of the area bounded by present-day PSSAs, the majority of which is covered by the area surrounding the Galapagos Islands. Areas such as the Peruvian Upwelling Core, the Eastern Caribbean and tMalpelo Island are extremely small; in truth the PSSAs just clip these EBSAs. The only other significant area of intersection occurs within the Straits of Bonifacio in the Mediterranean (Figure )