deletions | additions       diff --git a/Figures.tex b/Figures.tex  index a28b4c3..4dc8646 100644  --- a/Figures.tex  +++ b/Figures.tex 
...
\section{Analysis}  \begin{itemize}  \item compare \subsection{Neon Experiment}   E= 0.5 Ea   Using \ref{fig:NeonAnalysis} and Eq. \ref{eq:lowestlevel}, we plugged in x to be 0.5  to actual values... what sort find the excitation level for each  of analysis the linear fits shown in the plot. This generated a excitation energy of $19.4993 \pm 0.6$ eV. However, according to the NIST website, this number is closer  to the second excitation level (Fig. \ref{fig:NeonEnergyLevels}. \\  When we subtract the background from Fig. \ref{fig:NeonAnalysis}, the first excitation level does not appear because we are subtracting a quadratic function. This could  be done??  \item uncertainty??  \item intercept and a reason that why we only measure the second energy level. Another possible reason could be that we do not have enough data points. So when we subtract the quadratic function, we lose some of the dips since there are not enough data points to produce a  slope meanings??  \end{itemize} of 0 on either side of the dip. Therefore, we only measured the second energy level after subtracting the background.