Ning Zhu edited Figures.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 2c277afc3f973b0e469659a63d4a31737bbb3ed8

deletions | additions      

       

\subsection{Neon Experiment}   Using \ref{fig:NeonAnalysis} and Eq. \ref{eq:lowestlevel}, we plugged in x to be 0.5 to find the excitation level for each of the linear fits shown in the plot. This generated a excitation energy of $19.4993 \pm 0.6$ eV. This has to be the first excitation level because we derived Eq. \ref{eq:lowestlevel} by setting $E_a$ equal to the lowest energy level.However, level. However,  this is not consistent with the first excitation energy level shown on the NIST website. (Fig. \ref{fig:NeonEnergyLevels}.) \\ %When we subtract the background from Fig. \ref{fig:NeonAnalysis}, the first excitation level turns out to be quite high. And this has to be the first excitation level because we derived Eq. \ref{eq:lowestlevel} by setting $E_a$ equal to the lowest energy level. So, we conclude that we our data does not match the first excitation level of around 16.62eV. \\