deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  index 80ee940..f2db662 100644  --- a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  +++ b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex 
...
\section{Conclusion}  After performing the Johnson Noise Experiment and the Shot Noise Experiment, our measurements are very precise and accurate. We were able to get a Boltmann Contant of $1.46 \pm0.0054  \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1} \pm2.5 \cdot 10^{-21} \textrm{ 10^{-23}\textrm{  m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$ and $1.46 \pm0.0052  \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{K}^{-1} \pm2.6 \cdot 10^{-21} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{  K}^{-1}$ compared to the accepted value of the Boltzmann Consant: $1.38064852 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$. If we were to redo the Johnson Noise experiment, it would be helpful to vary the temperature and to vary the $R_{in}$ more times. I believe doing this experiment more times with different variations would provide a more accurate spread of data.