deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  index e65c626..b978843 100644  --- a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  +++ b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex 
...
After performing the Johnson Noise Experiment and the Shot Noise Experiment, our measurements are very precise and accurate. We were able to get a Boltmann Contant of $1.46 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$ compared to the accepted value of the Boltzmann Consant: $1.38064852 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$. For Johnson Noise, we were able to find the mass of the election within $2.4\%$ of the accepted value.   If we were to redo the Johnson Noise experiment, it would be helpful to vary the temperature and to vary the $\textrm{R_{in}}$ $R_{in}$  more times. I believe doing this experiment more times with different variations would provide a more accurate spread of data.