deletions | additions       diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md  index 653474d..fbfa3cc 100644  --- a/layout.md  +++ b/layout.md 
...
begin_table_begin_tabular_c__3.tex  Once_we_had_taken_values__.tex  figures/shot5/shot5.png  section_BEGIN_EDITORIAL_COMMENT_THIS__.tex  section_Analysis__.tex  The_error_in_our_analysis__.tex  section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  diff --git a/section_BEGIN_EDITORIAL_COMMENT_THIS__.tex b/section_BEGIN_EDITORIAL_COMMENT_THIS__.tex  deleted file mode 100644  index 842709d..0000000  --- a/section_BEGIN_EDITORIAL_COMMENT_THIS__.tex  +++ /dev/null 
...
\section{BEGIN EDITORIAL COMMENT: THIS PAPER IS TIRESOMELY SLOPPY! Current in Amps versus current in Amps equals the charge on the electron???????? You can and should do much better on a first draft, and your editor deserves better proofreading than this. A real editor would send it back unedited, and no one would be able to follow what you have done from what you have written thus far if they hadn't already done the experiment. Please remember your audience when writing}  To clarify, perhaps, A full FIRST draft doesn't mean you don't re-read, proofread, and revise before submitting, it means you have done this before you send it to an editor for their FIRST reading. It has taken me multiple days ---days longer than it should have -- to fully comment on this one paper (yes, more than 24 hours of just writing comments) , and I haven't been able to comment on everything that needs improvement or correction. I realize that because of the delay in submission, the poor quality of the draft that was submitted, and the time thus required for comments, you now have very little time to make all the corrections that are necessary, but I expect them to be done. The grade for this paper as is would be a 60, and it could easily have been 95 based on the quality of the data.