this is for holding javascript data
Madeline Horn deleted section_Johnson_Noise_To_detect__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: a78d8a04c42fc91a5fca7eb3fce7d2ad6601dcdd
deletions | additions
diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md
index 3d092d8..3cb47f1 100644
--- a/layout.md
+++ b/layout.md
...
subsection_Johnson_Noise_Johnson_noise__.tex
To_detect_Johnson_Noise_in__.tex
subsection_Shot_Noise_The_reason__.tex
section_Johnson_Noise_To_detect__.tex
textbf_As_discussed_in_class__.tex
subsection_Method_textbf_YOU_NEED__.tex
begin_centering_textbf_Electronics_Setup__.tex
diff --git a/section_Johnson_Noise_To_detect__.tex b/section_Johnson_Noise_To_detect__.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index f4f668a..0000000
--- a/section_Johnson_Noise_To_detect__.tex
+++ /dev/null
...
\section{Johnson Noise}
To detect Johnson Noise in order to find the Boltzmann constant, we used the Noise Fundamentals devices and two digital multi-meters. We collected two sets of data, one with a $10K$ ohm resistor, and another with a $1K$ ohm resistor, to make sure our data is consistent, to see the dependence of Johnson Noise on resistance, and to obtain a comparatively more accurate and precise value for the Boltzmann constant. We also collected data using a $1$ ohm resistor. Since the resistance is so small that the Johnson noise is much smaller than the instrumental noise, we were able to find the noise in the apparatus to be subtracted out of our data for the $10\textrm{k}\Omega$ and $1\textrm{k}\Omega$ resistors. This will give us a more accurate result.