deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  index 7509342..4a00776 100644  --- a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex  +++ b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex 
...
\section{Conclusion}  After performing the Johnson Noise Experiment and the Shot Noise Experiment, our measurements are very precise and accurate. We were able to get a Boltmann Contant of $1.46 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$  compared to the accepted value of the Boltzmann Consant: $1.38064852 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$.For Johnson Noise, we were able to find the mass of the election within $2.4\%$ of the accepted value.  If we were to redo the Johnson Noise experiment, it would be helpful to vary the temperature and to vary the $\textrm{R_{in}}$ more times. I believe doing this experiment more times with different variations would provide a more accurate spread of data.  We were able to find the charge of an electron from our experiment: $1.64 \cdot 10^{-19}$ coulombs, compared to the accepted value ($1.60217662 \cdot 10^{ -19} \textrm{ coulombs}$) we came within $2.4\%$.