this is for holding javascript data
Lucy Liang deleted As_stated_in_the_methods__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 59e701c3fb4b6e4c098e4bcc45a3ca6342bfce6d
deletions | additions
diff --git a/As_stated_in_the_methods__.tex b/As_stated_in_the_methods__.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 53e4d02..0000000
--- a/As_stated_in_the_methods__.tex
+++ /dev/null
...
As stated in the methods section, our settings for the Noise Fundamentals devices were as follows: we used the trans-impedance amplifier with a resistance of $10 k \Omega$, a Gain ($G1$) of $\times100$ through the preamp, we used a bandwidth of $100$ KHz which has an equivalent noise bandwidth of $115.303$ KHz, and we varied the voltage across the photo-diode from $0$ to $-120 \textrm{ mV}$.
To avoid saturating the values of Vsq (read from the multimeter attached after the signal ($V_{sq}$) went through the filter, the gain, and the multiplier) we had to vary the gain ($G2$) from $\times5000$, to $\times4000$, and finally to $\times3000$. Our multiplier had a setting of AxA because we needed to square the signal. We recorded the Vsq values in Volts and we recorded the V across the photo-diode in mV. $V_{sq}$ is the signal that has been filtered.
When we recorded the data, we needed to find the noise in the instruments in order to find the systematic error and eliminate it from our recorded values of both multi-meters: $V_{sq}$ and the voltage across the photo-diode. The systematic error arises from mean noise voltage due to the amplifier, gain, and multiplier. In order to do this, every time we changed our gain, we had to drop the voltage across the photo-diode to $0$V and record the systematic error in both multi-meters.
diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md
index 4e0a47a..0e0bd3d 100644
--- a/layout.md
+++ b/layout.md
...
Once_we_had_taken_values__1.tex
figures/IMG_1/IMG_1.png
textbf_section_Shot_Noise_textbf__.tex
As_stated_in_the_methods__.tex
figures/shot5/shot5.png
subsection_Shot_Noise_Plotly_Data__.tex
section_Error_Analysis__.tex