this is for holding javascript data
Madeline Horn edited To_analyze_this_data_we__1.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 185f0faf94ee79bb3863b1b13c9db87891be630e
deletions | additions
diff --git a/To_analyze_this_data_we__1.tex b/To_analyze_this_data_we__1.tex
index c6dc595..238b259 100644
--- a/To_analyze_this_data_we__1.tex
+++ b/To_analyze_this_data_we__1.tex
...
where $k_B$ is the Boltzmann Constant we are looking for, $T$ is the temperature in Kelvin, $R$ is the resistance in ohms, and $\Delta f$ is the ``equivalent noise bandwidth'' (ENBW) that we varied by changing the values on the low and high pass filters. In order to find the $k_B$, we will be plotting the data as $V^2/4TR$ versus $\Delta f$ to find the slope which is proportional to $k_B$. Or, if you prefer, you can create a plot where the slope is equal to $k_B T \Delta f$ -(plotting $V^2$ versus $4R$), than solve for $k_B$. Personally, we found it easier to plot the data so that the slope was proportional to $k_B$.
In order to find the bandwidth, we had to use values that came from the Noise Fundamentals Test Data
(\href{http://teachspin.com/instruments/noise/index.shtml}{Teachspin Manual}) (\ref{table:Johnson2}), which gave us the
actual measured values from the
filters. different filters and amplifiers. You can see the values we used in \ref{table:Johnson2}, and as you can see, the measured values are different from the nominal values. After using the measured values from the Noise Fundamentals test data, we had to calculate the Equivolent Noise Bandwidth (ENBW) in order to find $\Delta f$. To do this, we used an equation:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ENBW}