this is for holding javascript data
Madeline Horn edited To_analyze_this_data_we__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 176ae708a40b6c4b9ef227411eb164d1d6d8213a
deletions | additions
diff --git a/To_analyze_this_data_we__.tex b/To_analyze_this_data_we__.tex
index 3c4bcf6..0f39a8d 100644
--- a/To_analyze_this_data_we__.tex
+++ b/To_analyze_this_data_we__.tex
...
\label{eq:ENBW}
ENBW = f_c (Pi \cdot Q / 2)
\end{equation}
The Q values came from the Noise Fundamental test data and are shown in Table
2. 4. By using this equation, we found the Equivolent Noise Bandwith or $\Delta f$. After plotting $V^2/4TR$ versus Bandwidth ($\Delta f$), we were able to find the slope. Because of how we plotted the data, the slope is therefore K, the Boltlmann Constant. You can see these graphs in FIGURE WHAT. We did two different Boltmann experiments, one with a $10K$ ohm resistor and one with a $1K$ ohm resistor. Both values were obtained from the slope of FIGURES WHAT and both values were $1.46 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$. This is close to the actual Boltzmann Constant ($1.38064852 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$) and the accuracy of this result is due to systematic error.