this is for holding javascript data
Madeline Horn edited section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 02a7165953904bab6cfc7c908e35463fba02ecda
deletions | additions
diff --git a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex
index e65c626..7509342 100644
--- a/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex
+++ b/section_Conclusion_After_performing_the__.tex
...
\section{Conclusion}
After performing the Johnson Noise Experiment and the Shot Noise Experiment, our measurements are very precise and accurate. We were able to get a Boltmann Contant of
$1.46 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$ compared to the accepted value of the Boltzmann Consant: $1.38064852 \cdot 10^{-23} \textrm{ m}^2 \textrm{ kg} \textrm{ s}^{-2} \textrm{ K}^{-1}$. For Johnson Noise, we were able to find the mass of the election within $2.4\%$ of the accepted value.
If we were to redo the Johnson Noise experiment, it would be helpful to vary the temperature and to vary the $\textrm{R_{in}}$ more times. I believe doing this experiment more times with different variations would provide a more accurate spread of data.