7. There are some small errors and unclear writings. I think they need to be elaborated.

A)Section 5.4, Paragraph 4: “... a baseline for precision and accuracy” What is accuracy?

Well spotted. Ambiguous terms indeed should have no place in scientific papers. We have deleted accuracy from that sentence.

B) Section 5.4, Paragraph 6: “... impossible for the re-id to correctly classify” -> “... impossible for the re-id to be correctly classified”?

Thank you for noticing this passage was not clear. For clarity, we have changed it to

Note that the 155 FPs generated by the detector cannot be correctly re-identified, since they do not have a respective class in the gallery.

C) Table 3: Is parenthesis after 198 necessary?

No, indeed it is not. The table even looks better without it. Thank you for pointing it out.

D) Section 7, Paragraph 2: Something is wrong with parameter values after T.

Fixed.

E) Section 7, Paragraph 6: “They sport the most number of ...” Is this correct?

We believe so. Nevertheless, for clarity we changed it to

Scenarios MANUALclean and MANUALcleanhalf are also baselines, complementary to MANUALall. They suffer from the most number of MDs of all scenarios, thus exhibiting the lowest recall values.