deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Reviewer_Comments_for_Authors__.tex b/section_Reviewer_Comments_for_Authors__.tex  index ed2a92b..dcaeae5 100644  --- a/section_Reviewer_Comments_for_Authors__.tex  +++ b/section_Reviewer_Comments_for_Authors__.tex 
...
\textit{We thank the reviewer to point this out, as it makes clear that we must clarify in the text that multi-shot algorithms that we are aware of (such as [4]) require a way to specify which images belong to a single person (such as a tracker or manual selection) to then be able to analyze those images in a multi-shot fashion. No multi-shot algorithm that we are aware of does some kind of unsupervised clustering first to try and discover which images belong to a same individual, to be able to use such data in a multi-shot fashion without a tracker or human intervention.   Therefor, we have enhanced the clarifying paragraph thusly:}  \begin{quote}  Although \textbf{Although  this procedure is similar to multi-shot, it requires less information. In this work, window-based classification works with any single-shot re-identification algorithm, and does not require an in-camera tracker, tracker or manual selection of the images that belong to each individual,  contrary to the majority all  of the works that do multi-shot re-identification.  \end{quote} re-identification known to the authors.}  4. The discussion in Chapter 7 is an analysis of the experimental results in Chapter 6, which should be belonged to the same Chapter for clearly reading.