deletions | additions       diff --git a/textbf_Our_smallest_value_of__.tex b/textbf_Our_smallest_value_of__.tex  index 820c02b..3fa71b1 100644  --- a/textbf_Our_smallest_value_of__.tex  +++ b/textbf_Our_smallest_value_of__.tex 
...
\textbf{Our smallest value of $\tilde{\chi}^2$ was approximately 0.08 and our largest value of $\tilde{\chi}^2$ was approximately 0.17, which corresponded with the best and worst fits respectively. Since we reject $\tilde{\chi}^2$ when it is less than ?? we assume that instead of meaning that our fit was incorrect, there was instead a problem with our error bars, which we believe to be too small. This problem effects Thus we believe that our error bars on the plot of $\frac{\delta t}{\delta \omega}$ versus ratio number should be much larger. Therefore it is likely that given larger error bars,  the plots of} of \frac{\delta t}{\delta \omega}$ should either fit a line with slope=0 or some non zero slope, which would indicate that our frequency scan is non-linear.}