this is for holding javascript data
William edited The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 9a2057e1806060b08cbfb7bc137a066c027b87a5
deletions | additions
diff --git a/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex b/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex
index 16a11bb..5300ff4 100644
--- a/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex
+++ b/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex
...
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Using the above equation, the intercept was found to be a value of $E_a = 4.418\pm0.20 \textrm{eV}$ at $n=0.5$. This value does not match the accepted values of $4.6674eV$ and $4.8865eV$
(cite) (NIST database values) within uncertainty. The method used in the analysis of Figure 7 had much more accurate results, thus it was concluded that although the value of $n=2$ is not on the line of best fit, using separate linear fits to approximate $\Delta E$ versus $n$ is a better method.