this is for holding javascript data
Madeline Horn edited As_seen_in_Figure_4__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 3a23e61998208981ae58fe0d31a8a0604d7ef418
deletions | additions
diff --git a/As_seen_in_Figure_4__.tex b/As_seen_in_Figure_4__.tex
index b13707f..d938bfc 100644
--- a/As_seen_in_Figure_4__.tex
+++ b/As_seen_in_Figure_4__.tex
...
As seen in Figure 4 the intercept at $n=0.5$ is $12.5 eV$, which is quite different from the expect value of
$16.61906936eV$. $16.619eV$. For the dips it is a little bit better at a value of $~19eV$. It is unlikely that even with the inclusion of error, the measured value for the lowest excited energy would match the expected value. This may be because the Franck-Hertz curve collected only had 3 dip values and 2 peak values. Had more dips and peaks been observed before ionization, the intercept at $n=(0.5)$ might have been closer to the expected value.