deletions | additions       diff --git a/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex b/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex  index 5c9e7a7..446ed87 100644  --- a/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex  +++ b/The_equation_found_for_Single__.tex 
...
\end{split}  \end{equation}  Using the above equation, the intercept was found to be a value of $E_a = 4.418\pm0.20 \textrm{eV}$ at $n=0.5$. This value does not match the accepted values of $4.6674ev$ and $4.8865ev$ (cite) within uncertainty. The method used in the analysis of Figure 6 7  had much more accurate results, thus it was concluded that although the value of $n=2$ is not on the line of best fit, using separate linear fits to approximate $\Delta E$ versus $n$ is a better method.