deletions | additions       diff --git a/textit_Kept_polarization_time_constant__.tex b/textit_Kept_polarization_time_constant__.tex  index 9342310..d5fb056 100644  --- a/textit_Kept_polarization_time_constant__.tex  +++ b/textit_Kept_polarization_time_constant__.tex 
...
-Kept current constant and varied polarization, measuring amplitude and therefore magnetization. We could see find our saturation polarization time this way, as the amplitude eventually stops increasing.\\  -Then kept polarization time constant at 10s (saturation) and varied current, recording amplitude. In this way we can find dependence of magnetization on magnetic field.\\}  We could vary the polarization time and the current (and therefore magnetic field) to see their effects (if any) on precession frequency and amplitude (and therefore magnetization). In order to measure the frequency, we adjusted the scale of the oscilloscope so that we had at least 10 (but not many more) periods on the oscilloscope display, and measured the frequency for 10 cycles, using the cycles. We used  frequency the oscilloscope measured for 10 cycles to determine the frequency of one cycle- the Larmor precession frequency. In order to measure amplitude, we chose the tops of three cycles which fell on the points t=0 ms, t=50 ms, ad t=100 ms, corresponding to the time after the polarization field is no longer applied, and measured the amplitude of the peak at each of those points as they were points which we could find easily on the oscilloscope. For all the data we took, we plotted the shape of the amplitude vs (whichever variable we were determining dependence upon) separately for each of the three points, as they should all tell us the same information but fall at different times in the data. \\  We first kept the polarization time constant at 4s and varied the current from 0.5A to 3.0A \textbf{(corresponding to varying field from x T to y T)} in order to determine the dependence of precession frequency upon polarization field. We found there to be no dependence, as predicted by Equation ~ref{precession}. We then