Paul St-Aubin edited Results.tex  about 9 years ago

Commit id: a9a135c5946c07d5b48ab3ea971d91092a8488e3

deletions | additions      

       

\begin{tabular}{ll}  \hline  \textbf{Roundabouts} & 20 \\  \textbf{Analysis Areas} & 41 38  \\ \textbf{Hours of Video Data} & 473 \\  \textbf{Estimated Total Traffic Volume} & 79,432 \\  \textbf{Disk Space (Video + Data + Overhead)} & 1.9 TB \\ 

\end{tabular}  \end{table}  Figure~\ref{fig:flow-userpairs} shows hourly number of user pairs observed versus traffic volume. Trends are evident, but explaining factors are not clear (probably a mix of several lane arrangement indicators). This will need further study. The number of user pairs per hour should be linearly correlated with the number of interaction instants as is demonstrated in Figure~\ref{fig:userpairs-interactions}. If they are not, it is possible that analysis areas across sites are not comparable, particularly for time-series analysis and aggregated disaggregated  TTCs. % paul: "The number of user pairs per hour should be linearly correlated with the number of interaction instants as is demonstrated in Figure~\ref{fig:userpairs-interactions}. If they are not, it is possible that some site analysis areas are not comparable." not sure why...  % paul->nicolas: Added more details to explain this.