deletions | additions       diff --git a/big science.md b/big science.md  index f750e86..a4ae2ac 100644  --- a/big science.md  +++ b/big science.md 
...
En masse, science is becoming really big science. An new paradigm for science is emerging that is making collaboration in science much easier. There are some very strong advocates for open science that aim to evangelise the science community at large. At the same time, Software as a Service (SaaS) tools are enabling a more open science. Cloud based storage and computing services provided by Google, Dropbox, and Amazon are pervasive in research science. Software is making it easier for researchers to communicate, share, and access information. Software is enabling the Big Data infrastructure that industry demands and it is beginning to support the scientific community, too. But, the pantheons of science are fighting back with more technologies, more variety, more data formats, more ~~ideas~~ assumptions which complicate software development. There is a big difference between research science and software development, but big science hinges on a smooth interface between the dissemination of research and software requirements.  The tension in science is being driven by extremely demanding design spaces. The scale of scientific exploration has greatly exceeded reductionist approaches. Science has been proliferated fringe communities of domain experts who, with experience, have the experience and rite to guide their field, hell someone had to. These domains have unique lexicons, lots of acronyms, and enough secrets to imagine there must be a secret handshake. The factions in science are being required to work together and its real awkward. We talk funny, we talk pidgin. Science policy is addressing the digital aspects of the language, or information barrier, but the domain lexicons are a troublesome bit of language. The language of science is going to evolve over the coming years as we witness some disruptions of globalized scinece. science.  Globalized science is going to confront an ever presented cultural gap  There is a distinct generation gap in science. The current thought leaders from GenY and prior have grown up on the fringe of science, they have worked in small fishbowls, small communities that are indicative of the times they were raised in. The newest breed of scientist has learned to exist is a mobile and social manner shattering all ideas of community boundaries. For the new generation, science isn't designed for them; they lead disparate digital lives in science and their personal life. This dissonance will not exist for long, really their is no point in resisting.