Essential Maintenance: All Authorea-powered sites will be offline 9am-10am EDT Tuesday 28 May
and 11pm-1am EDT Tuesday 28-Wednesday 29 May. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Anisha Keshavan edited The_number_of_phantom_subjects__.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 93f27e04087788e1b51d9c067b2124b92d45d620

deletions | additions      

       

In the text, it was emphasized that the derived power equation does not require phantom subjects or calibration to be used:  "\textit{We emphasize that the use of phantom subjects do does  not directly contribute to the power equation in Figure 1, as it does not account for any sort of calibration or scaling. However, it requires an estimate for $CV_a$, which is the variability of scaling biases between sites. The goal of this study is to provide researchers with estimates of $CV_a$ from our set of calibration phantoms and our set of non-standardized MRI acquisitions. For a standardized set of scanners, these values may be considered an upper bound. }"