deletions | additions       diff --git a/Colleagues_that_work_on_ADNI__.tex b/Colleagues_that_work_on_ADNI__.tex  index 8c865bc..9bf909e 100644  --- a/Colleagues_that_work_on_ADNI__.tex  +++ b/Colleagues_that_work_on_ADNI__.tex 
...
Colleagues that work on ADNI data at UCSF, UCSF  verified that the same healthy controls were not scanned at multiple sites, and so the method is not directly comparable. Instead our results were compared to 3 other harmonization efforts. In the first, our between site ICC results pre- and post- calibration were compared to the between-site ICC results of \cite{cannon2014}. In \cite{cannon2014}, the sites were harmonized and an ADNI phantom was used to correct gradient distortions. The authors ran FSL's FIRST for subcortical segmentation, and a cortical pattern matching algorithm for gray/white segmentation. They then calculated the between-site ICC using variance components similar to our study. The table below was added to the manuscript: \begin{table}   \begin{tabular}{ c c c c }