this is for holding javascript data
Anisha Keshavan edited Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 5d07578592ffeff48f89bcdf82601a150775d6c8
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex b/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
index 9825d94..f72dcb8 100644
--- a/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
+++ b/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
...
Our results should be compared to the cross-sectional results from \cite{jovicich2013brain} which had notably worse reliability than the longitudinal results. We have included 2 new tables that compare our results to \cite{jovicich2013brain} and \cite{cannon2014} both in the manuscript and in the response to reviewer 2's similar major concern. We found that our mean within-site
ICC was ICC's were in the same range as \cite{jovicich2013brain}, which makes sense because we are using the same cross-sectional pipeline and the sequences are close to the standard vendor sequences of \cite{jovicich2013brain}.