Anisha Keshavan edited abstract.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 58b38d3553efc02752bb78f44caadd3d1e823b73

deletions | additions      

       

The major weaknesses of this manuscript that I've addressed are:  \begin{enumerate}  \item I gave the impression that one needs to scan human calibration phantoms at each site to properly power a multisite study with nonstandardized parameters, which is very costly and certainly was not our intention! I have focused on emphasizing the statistical model which takes MRI bias into account (that bias was measured via calibration, but that is not the central point).  \item Compare our measurements with other harmonization efforts  \item Specify the scanning parameters of our consortium, by including more paramaters that show the variance of our sites  \item Better address the independence assumption between the unobserved effect and the scaling factor for a particular site.  \end{enumerate}