this is for holding javascript data
Anisha Keshavan added Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 3c4fe5f001b6f84c0b78c2216cbc883e79ec89d2
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex b/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5ec5a4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Our_results_should_be_compared__.tex
...
Our results should be compared to the cross-sectional results from \cite{jovicich2013brain} which had notably worse reliability than the longitudinal results. I have included 2 new tables that compare our results to \cite{jovicich2013brain} and \cite{cannon2014} both in the manuscript and in the response to reviewer 2's similar major concern. We found that our mean within-site ICC was in the same range as \cite{jovicich2013brain}, which makes sense because we are using the same cross-sectional pipeline and the sequences are close to the standard vendor sequences of \cite{jovicich2013brain}.
