this is for holding javascript data
Anisha Keshavan edited Initially_a_few_scans_that__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 121e2a1ca09b9ab1bdef736abc75b0d9799a7003
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Initially_a_few_scans_that__.tex b/Initially_a_few_scans_that__.tex
index 01f8493..dd28d88 100644
--- a/Initially_a_few_scans_that__.tex
+++ b/Initially_a_few_scans_that__.tex
...
Initially a few scans that had small amounts of dura classified as brain at the top of the head were mistakenly excluded. Those scans were then included to see if it affected the results (in particular, $CV_a$, as this is the most important for power
calculations) and found that including calculations). Including these subjects did not change the
results. The results from results, and the revised
dataset results are shown in the manuscript. eTIV registration checks were
also added to the QC procedure. This makes
more sense because this is the one of the first steps in recon-all and a bad registration to the talairach template could lead to innacurate segmentations overall. 3 scans were left out from eTIV misregistration in total: 1 scan from the same subject in sites 4 and 6 and another at site 11. Due to time constraints, not all 12 people were able to be scanned at some of the sites. Other scans that were left out include one scan where part of the head was not acquired (possibly the files were corrupted), and one scan was left out because it was an identical copy of the first instead of a rescan (perhaps a problem with transferring data). A column was added in the acquisition tables to reflect how many actual scans were acquired at each site, and information about why the scans were left out was added in the Methods section.