Michael Retchin edited Shot optimization.tex  over 9 years ago

Commit id: 291f2245d0658e0f17c46951f9cace6bb46665e3

deletions | additions      

       

For the present study, the typically asexual operator, a mutation, was used: a single parent chrosome is altered randomly to produce a new one. With each iteration, or generation, members of a population, in this case the set of possible circle arrangements in the square lattice, are then assessed by a fitness function. The fitness determines which chromosomes are passed on to the next generation, a kind of "selection" function. The selection function can be described as a roulette selection: let $p$ denote population size, let $m_i$ denote population members, for $1≤i≤p$, and let $f(m)$ denote the fitness function for a chromosome; the "wheel size" of the roulette game is set by  \begin{equation}  W= \sideset{}{}\sum_{j=1}^{n}e^{i\theta j} \sideset{}{}\sum_{1}^{p}f(c_i)  \end{equation}  $F_{1}$ score. It utilizes two terms - precision and recall. In terms of our mathematical model, precision is the number of tumor cells covered in the shot divided by the total number of cells covered by the shot. Recall, in context, is the number of cancer cells covered in a shot divided by the total number of cancer cells. The F_{1} score in our problem was calculated with this equation: