Andy Howell edited results.tex  about 10 years ago

Commit id: aa4c8401bc6af04b859fe167714d924d99b360a4

deletions | additions      

       

calibration without need of adjustment from the reducer. An exemple of  the line identifications is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:ident}  \begin{figure}  %\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\linewidth}  \centering  \includegraphics[scale=.25,angle=0]{./figs/arc_lines_blue.eps}  \includegraphics[scale=.25,angle=0]{./figs/arc_lines_red.eps}  \caption{Line identifications for the first and second order of the arc frame. }  \label{fig:ident}  \end{figure}  The following keywords are usually added to the science frame to keep track of the accuracy of the calibration:  \begin{small} 

The 2D frames (2df) after being flux and wavelength calibrated have  the following units: $10^{-20}$ erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,\AA$^{-1}$  \begin{figure}  %\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\linewidth}  \centering  \includegraphics[scale=.55,angle=0]{./figs/sens_blu1.eps}  \includegraphics[scale=.55,angle=0]{./figs/sens_blu2.eps}  \caption{Comparison of the rapid and final reductions for the classification spectrum of SN 2012fx, taken with Gr\#13 and a 1\arcsec\ slit on 2012 August 26.}  \label{fig:sensblue}  \end{figure}  \begin{table*}  \caption[]{FLOYDS spectrophotometric standards. All data in this table 

plots are shown to the user for feedback. An example of these plots is  shown in Fig. \ref{fig:check}.  \begin{figure}  %\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\linewidth}  \centering  \includegraphics[scale=.4,angle=0]{./figs/telluric.eps}  \includegraphics[scale=.4,angle=0]{./figs/telluric2.eps}  \caption{Comparison of the observed telluric absorption and sky lines with a template from the archive.}  \label{fig:check}  \end{figure}  \subsection{Fringing correction}  \label{sec:fringing}