deletions | additions       diff --git a/discussion.tex b/discussion.tex  index 82c119b..e4e0147 100644  --- a/discussion.tex  +++ b/discussion.tex 
...
\section{Discussion} \label{sec:discussion}  In the preceding section, we applied our model to develop and assess a computationally serendipitous system, based on the idea of a writers workshop. We will now discuss implications from our findings for future research, and outline potential next steps.  \input{recommendations}  \input{future-work-intro}  \input{future-work-conclusion}  diff --git a/recommendations.tex b/recommendations.tex  index c8f2f81..b560a13 100644  --- a/recommendations.tex  +++ b/recommendations.tex 
...
challenges for research in computational serendipity.  \begin{itemize}  \item \textbf{Autonomy}: Our case study on Serendipity serendipity  in recommender systems in Section \ref{sec:priorart} highlights the need for more autonomy on the system side. The thought experiment in Section \ref{sec:ww} develops a design illustrating the relationship between  creativity at the level of artefacts (e.g.~new poems) and creativity  at the level of \emph{problem specification} (learning new poetic