Anna Jordanous edited related-work.tex  about 9 years ago

Commit id: e6e7d5df37577b3c0363c4f92b66e955d94bef27

deletions | additions      

       

\textbf{[Since we are now have the formal definition, let's be sure  that we're sufficiently thorough in connecting this related work  back to it -- and pointing out what still needs to be done.]}  \textbf{[AJ I would prefer this section and the Literature review  goes before the formal definition. Then the definition section can draw from the related work and lit review (why are related work and lit review separate sections?) and  it is a bit clearer where the definition work comes from.]} Paul Andr{\'e} et al.~\citeyear{andre2009discovery} look at  serendipity from a design point of view. These authors also propose a  two-part model, in which what we have called \emph{discovery} above