Natalie C. Landon-Brace edited Accuracy.tex  about 10 years ago

Commit id: f3acdaffe04e6d4708cc80f5ce25c6c72015dff6

deletions | additions      

       

The null hypothesis is therefore rejected in favor of the alternate hypothesis that shooting accuracy is best closest to the target.   \subsubsection{Comparing Accuracy at 10m vs. 20m}  By examining the results of the F-test and the paired t-Test, t-Test (as the same individuals shot in both trials),  we can make several conclusions about the relationship between the variances and means for shooting accuracy at 10m and 20m. Using the F-test distribution, it was determined that the variances of the two samples are unequal, as p < 0.05 for this test. The variance of the accuracy data at 10m is [INSERT SAMPLE VAR 1 HERE] and the variance of the accuracy data at 20 m is [INSERT SAMPLE VAR 2 HERE]. Furthermore, it was determined using the paired t-test that the mean accuracy of the two samples was not the same, as p < 0.05. The mean value of accuracy at 10m is [INSERT SAMPLE MEAN 1] and the mean value of accuracy at 20 m is [INSERT SAMPLE MEAN 2]. From this information, we can initially reject the null hypothesis, as it is clear that accuracy decreases with distance. 20-30  variances equal