this is for holding javascript data
Rein D. Otsason edited Results and Discussion.tex
about 10 years ago
Commit id: e6e63ddb66fd506d79b38841aff7f98ef627b2d1
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Results and Discussion.tex b/Results and Discussion.tex
index 537537f..9909f15 100644
--- a/Results and Discussion.tex
+++ b/Results and Discussion.tex
...
\subsection{Shooting Time vs. Distance}
\subsubsection{10m \subsubsection{10 m to
20m} 20 m}
An F-test was conducted and it was found that the
P-value p-value was greater than the alpha-significance level of 0.05, correlating with equal variances.
A paired t-test was conducted because the same
set of people participated at 10
m and
20m, 20 m, and the P-value was found to be less than the significance level. The means are therefore unequal,
with a shooting time
that was faster at 20m. The alternate hypothesis was therefore accepted over the null hypothesis.
\subsubsection{20m \subsubsection{20 m to
30m} 30 m}
Using an F-test it was found that the
P-value p-value was greater than the significance level,
therfore therefore the variances
within the two data sets were found are assumed to be
equal between the
same. two sets of data.
Participants did not all fire at
20m 20 m and
30m, 30 m, therefore a two-sample t-test was used instead of a paired t-test.
It was found that the
P-value p-value was greater than the significance level, corresponding with equal means. This means that shooting time was the same at both distances. The result is fail to reject the null hypothesis.
\subsubsection{10m \subsubsection{10 m to
30m} 30 m}
An F-test was conducted and it was found that the
P-value p-value was greater than the
alpha-significance significance level of 0.05,
correlating corresponding with equal variances.
Participants did not all fire at 10m and 30m, so a two-sample t-test was used instead of a paired t-test.
It was found that the
P-value p-value was lower than the significance level. The mean at
10m 10 m was less than the mean at
30m, 30 m, meaning that shooting time was faster at
10m. 10 m. Therefore the null hypothesis was rejected in favor of the alternate hypothesis.
\subsection{Summary}