deletions | additions       diff --git a/Accuracy.tex b/Accuracy.tex  index bbd3c35..ad2f776 100644  --- a/Accuracy.tex  +++ b/Accuracy.tex 
...
\subsection{Accuracy vs. Distance}  A Student's t-test with a 0.05 significance level was also conducted on the accuracy data at the three distances and established a difference in the mean of the distributions between the 10, 20 and 30 m mark. The distribution mean was lowest for accuracy at 10m. 10 m.  The null hypothesis is therefore rejected in favor of the alternate hypothesis that shooting accuracy is best closest to the target.   \subsubsection{Comparing Accuracy at 10m 10 m  vs. 20m} 20 m}  By examining the results of the F-test and the paired t-Test (as the same individuals shot in both trials), we can make several conclusions about the relationship between the variances and means for shooting accuracy at 10m and 20m. Using the F-test distribution, it was determined that the variances of the two samples are unequal, as p < 0.05 for this test. The variance of the accuracy data at 10m is [INSERT SAMPLE VAR 1 HERE] and the variance of the accuracy data at 20 m is [INSERT SAMPLE VAR 2 HERE]. Furthermore, it was determined using the paired t-test that the mean accuracy of the two samples was not the same, as p < 0.05. The mean value of accuracy at 10m is [INSERT SAMPLE MEAN 1] and the mean value of accuracy at 20 m is [INSERT SAMPLE MEAN 2]. From this information, we can initially reject the null hypothesis, as it is clear that accuracy decreases with distance.