this is for holding javascript data
Sgt. Samuel H. Buckstein edited Accuracy.tex
about 10 years ago
Commit id: 4a050abf1dc3fac869f036b660a4ebcac1a9582f
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Accuracy.tex b/Accuracy.tex
index ad2f776..5aea5a1 100644
--- a/Accuracy.tex
+++ b/Accuracy.tex
...
The null hypothesis is therefore rejected in favor of the alternate hypothesis that shooting accuracy is best closest to the target.
\subsubsection{Comparing Accuracy at 10 m vs. 20 m}
By examining the results of the F-test and the paired t-Test (as the same individuals shot in both trials), we can make several conclusions about the relationship between the variances and means for shooting accuracy at
10m 10 m and
20m. 20 m. Using the F-test distribution, it was determined that the variances of the two samples are unequal, as p < 0.05 for this test. The variance of the accuracy data at
10m 10 m is [INSERT SAMPLE VAR 1 HERE] and the variance of the accuracy data at 20 m is [INSERT SAMPLE VAR 2 HERE]. Furthermore, it was determined using the paired t-test that the mean accuracy of the two samples was not the same, as p < 0.05. The mean value of accuracy at
10m 10 m is [INSERT SAMPLE MEAN 1] and the mean value of accuracy at 20 m is [INSERT SAMPLE MEAN 2]. From this information, we can initially reject the null hypothesis, as it is clear that accuracy decreases with distance.