deletions | additions       diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md  index 19d026e..bd58332 100644  --- a/layout.md  +++ b/layout.md 
...
introduction.tex  figures/hilbert_zw3_w19_va_ERAInterim_500hPa_030day-runmean_native-55S_1986-05-22_2006-07-29/hilbert_zw3_w19_va_ERAInterim_500hPa_030day-runmean_native-55S_1986-05-22_2006-07-29.png  methods_part2.tex  figures/envva-w19-va_ERAInterim_500hPa_030day-runmean_native_1986-05-22_2006-07-29/envva-w19-va_ERAInterim_500hPa_030day-runmean_native_1986-05-22_2006-07-29.png  diff --git a/methods_part2.tex b/methods_part2.tex  deleted file mode 100644  index b651bc5..0000000  --- a/methods_part2.tex  +++ /dev/null 
...
By performing a Hilbert Transform at every latitude circle, a spatial map of the magnitude of the wave envelope can be constructed for each timestep (i.e. $E(t,\lambda,\phi)$). The utility of these maps is evident when considering the two maps (Figure \ref{fig:example_envelope}) that correspond to the single-latitude Hilbert Transforms shown in Figure \ref{fig:example_hilbert}. For both 22 May 1986 and 29 July 2006, it is clear that the wavenumber three component of the Fourier Transform is dominant at 54.75$^{\circ}$S (and at the other nearby latitudes not shown in Figure \ref{fig:example_hilbert}). An analysis based on single wavenumbers could lead one to believe that both timesteps are associated with a pronounced hemispheric ZW3 pattern, despite the fact that this is clearly only true for 29 July (Figure \ref{fig:example_envelope}). On 22 May the spatial scale of the anomalous flow from 200-260$^{\circ}$E approximately matches wavenumber three, but elsewhere the flow is strongly zonal. The other components of the Fourier Transform on this date serve to modulate the wavenumber three component accordingly, and by using the Hilbert Transform as opposed to a single wavenumber approach, this useful information is retained.