this is for holding javascript data
Lorenzo Perozzi edited Testing sequence.tex
over 9 years ago
Commit id: e6e971669119f9c707ba544e613ec8e24604ea2d
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Testing sequence.tex b/Testing sequence.tex
index de54d56..2a3f900 100644
--- a/Testing sequence.tex
+++ b/Testing sequence.tex
...
\subsection{Experimental results}
An essential characteristic \subsubsection{Testing sequence}
The first set of
the measurements was
made with pore space subject to
ensure that the variations of the waveform are linked only vacuum to
the change of the provide 'dry' properties
of fluids at different temperature and
not pressure conditions to
changes in pressure. Thus, all evaluate their effect on the rock frame. The measurements were
carried out at constant differential pressure then repeated with full CO$_2$ saturation under a variety of
14 MPa (corresponding to the reservoir conditions) by varying the confining pressure and the pore pressure
according to
\begin{equation}
P_{d} = P_{c} - P_{p},
\end{equation}
where $P_{d}$ is differential pressure, $P_{c}$ is confining pressure at 25 and
$P_{p}$ is pore pressure.
As the sample is buffered by two aluminum caps, the travel time measured must be corrected 35 $^{\circ}$C in order to
obtain the wave velocity $\nu$ of the sample using
\begin{equation}
\nu = \frac{L_{s}}{t_{bs}-t_{b}},
\end{equation}
where $L_s$ is the sample length and $t_{bs} - t_{b}$ is the difference between the travel time through the aluminum buffer and the sample $t_{bs}$ and the traveltime through the aluminum buffer without sample
$t_b$.\\
We present here the
measurements made for full
range of CO$_2$
saturation phases states (Fig. \ref{fig:velocityco2}). Finally 'dry' measurements were repeated to asses any mechanical change that have altered the rock 'dry' properties. For each measurements, five minutes were necessary to equilibrate at
two constant
temperature (25 and 35 $^{\circ}$C) with the pore pressure
varying form 2 prior to
25 MPa in each case. Carbon dioxide is in gaseous state at lower pore pressure, and in liquid or supercritical state at higher pore pressures, depending on acquisition of the
temperature as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:velocityco2}. Wave velocities and signal amplitude for $P$- and $S$-wave for waveforms. To reduce random noise effects, the
two constant temperature runs are plotted in Fig \ref{fig:results_lab}. In each subplots, curves for both Cainside (red) and Covey Hill samples (yellow) are shown. final waveform recorded is a stack of at least 100 traces.