this is for holding javascript data
Lorenzo Perozzi edited Becancour like1.tex
over 9 years ago
Commit id: d8ab6119c35e01534dc214221b7517f59ea5d558
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Becancour like1.tex b/Becancour like1.tex
index 328f12a..450c686 100644
--- a/Becancour like1.tex
+++ b/Becancour like1.tex
...
\subsubsection{Bécancour-like scenario}
In Figure \ref{fig:fig8} shows the corridor stack for 7 offsets. For each corridor stack, black traces refer to the baseline
survey. Red survey and red traces refer to CO$_2$ injected scenario. A travel-time delay due to the CO$_2$ injection is well detected starting at 500 ms. The effect of CO$_2$ is mainly observed by a travel-time delay. Other authors reported similar obervations \citep{Yang2014,Arts2004}. We can also notice an AVO anomaly with an amplitude increase with the offset at the basement reflector. Since the saturation and the CO$_2$ plume shape
doesn't do not evolve too much in the time-lapse modeling, we do not have significant variation between repeated monitoring.\\
Figure \ref{fig:fig11} shows the comparaison of the seismograms obtained from a stochastic geological model (left) versus a blocky model (right) for a
time-lapse of 5
years. years time-lapse. As expected, the lack of detail in the
block blocky model is reflected in the seismograms. For exemple, the time-delay
that appears at at
about 500
ms due to the CO$_2$ for the stochastic seismigrams, ms, is not observable in the
block blocky seismograms.