deletions | additions       diff --git a/case-study.tex b/case-study.tex  index 5c498c4..080bacd 100644  --- a/case-study.tex  +++ b/case-study.tex 
...
\caption{\label{tab:feval} Speedup comparison for \feval\ optimization.}   \end{table}     We Unfortunately, we  are unable to report compute direct  performance metrics for the solution by Lameed and Hendren as their implementation is since its source code has  not publicly available. According to numbers shown been released. Numbers  in their paper~\cite{lameed2013feval}, their paper~\cite{lameed2013feval} show that for these benchmarks the  OSR-based approachon average  yields a fraction of the speed-up from hand-coded calls on average  equal to $52\%$, ranging $30.1\%$ (ranging  from $9.2\%$ to $93.9\%$; $73.9\%$);  for the JIT-based approach this fraction grows to $90.6\%$, and is never smaller than $75.7\%$. $84.7\%$ (ranging from $75.7\%$ to $96.5\%$).