deletions | additions       diff --git a/ALMA config [1].tex b/ALMA config [1].tex  index cee78f4..84607d5 100644  --- a/ALMA config [1].tex  +++ b/ALMA config [1].tex 
...
\section{ALMA Configuration}  Table 1 shows some statistics about We simulated observations using  the following  ALMA configurations used. configurations.  \begin{center}  \begin{tabular}{c | c | c | c | c | c} 
...
\end{tabular}  \end{center}  Changing the We found using runs 16, 18 and 26 that changing  configuration has substantial effect had a significant impact  on both the mass and velocity our  results. \subsection{Mass}  As the vast majority of the mass that we want to observe is extended, we would While one may  expect that arrays with a  larger Beams area and baseline  would give better results. We can see results, we found that  this in the comparison between observations made with was not true. As much of  the two cycle 1 arrays. These arrays only differ in their beam size and so outflow is extended,  we can attribute need a larger beam. The beam is  the change of results to this. most important parameter when observing using ALMA. The effect can be seen when comparing R14 and R17.