deletions | additions       diff --git a/Temperature [1].tex b/Temperature [1].tex  index 5c37c4c..bb83fa9 100644  --- a/Temperature [1].tex  +++ b/Temperature [1].tex 
...
\end{equation}  (Bourke et al. 1997)  We used examined  the simulation data  to determinereasonable  values to use  for the temperature of excitation. We we  found that the technique employed in Bourke temperature varied significantly over the data cube but that the majority  of assuming a constant 11 K the mass  was fairly accurate. However, we could improved slightly upon this by using at ~12K. We followed the same protocol as observers and assumed a single temperature of excitation for each time. These  temperatures calculated are shown  in the simulation. There is figure 2. we find that there was  a systematic bias to overestimating in overesimating  the mass, mass  which we attribute to the fact that temperature is not constant through the object.  The following graphs show the mass calculated over time for various assumptions about the temperature imprecision  of excitation. calculating mass from an average temperature. This is shown in figure 3