deletions | additions       diff --git a/Temperature [1].tex b/Temperature [1].tex  index e7818f3..b5dc0c0 100644  --- a/Temperature [1].tex  +++ b/Temperature [1].tex 
...
\end{equation}  (Bourke et al. 1997)  We examined the simulation data to determine values found that there was a systematic bias  to use for overestimate  the mass of the outflow. We attribute this to errors in assuming a single  temperature of excitation. we We examined the simulation data and  found that the there was significant  temperature varied significantly over variation in  the data cube but that the majority of the mass was at ~12K. and slight temperature variation over time.  We followed the same protocol as observers and assumed a single temperature of excitation for each image. However we used a different temperature for each  time. These temperatures are shown in table 2.we find that there was a systematic bias in overesimating the mass which we attribute to the imprecision of calculating mass from an average temperature. This is shown in figure 2  \subsection{Temperature used}  \begin{center}  \begin{tabular}{c | c}  Time (Myr)  & Temperature (K)  \\ \hline  0.2 & 17.2254077826 \\  0.24 & 11.2679129249 \\