this is for holding javascript data
Christopher edited Temperature [1].tex
almost 10 years ago
Commit id: 8ab064ff70f953e0ac8a6d3165731b8836e7e9d4
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Temperature [1].tex b/Temperature [1].tex
index 90d63c7..145eca5 100644
--- a/Temperature [1].tex
+++ b/Temperature [1].tex
...
\begin{equation} %\label{eqn:J(T)}
J(T) = \frac{hv}{k(e ^ {\frac{hv}{kT}} - 1)}
\end{equation}
$M$ is the
total mass, $[{\rm H}_2/^{12}{\rm CO}]$ the mass ratio between $H_2$ and $^{12}CO$
(assumed to be $1/(8.6 ($1/(8.6 * 10 ^{-5})$, $\mu_m$ the mean molecular mass of
$H_2$, $H_2$ ($2 * 1.6733 * 10 ^{-24}g$), $A$ the area of emission (1 pixel), $T_{ex}$ the assumed temperature of excitation, $T_{bg}$ the background temperature
(assumed to be 0K), ($0K$), $T_B$ the
brightness temperature, temperature calculated using the Rayleigh Jeans law, $\Delta v$ the velocity resolution,
k $k$ the Boltzman constant, $v$ the frequency of observation (115.3Ghz for $^{12}CO$, 110.2Ghz for
$^{13}CO$). $^{13}CO$), $h$ Planck's constant.
(Bourke et al. 1997)
{\bf Every symbol here must be defined. What is v, what is alpha, A, etc? Explain it to yourself a year ago. If that you wouldn't understand, the reader probably won't either. State what this equation assumes. Also how do you get $T_B$ from the datacube I gave you? Give the equation you use.
} Edit: I think that this has been dealt with, though not 100\% sure I have explained everything. Have checked the code and these are the equations. Should I include the fact that mass is the integral/sum over all pixels or is that implied?}
To ontain the momentum and energy, we used the calculated mass for each voxel as well as its known velocity. The data had velocity resolution of 0.08 km/s and included mass with $|v| < 10 km/s$.
{\bf need to add a couple sentences on how you derive the momentum and energy: "To obtain the momentum..."}
{\bf Before discussing excitation temperature, need a general paragraph on the basic trends, i.e. what does the raw simulation show, what are the general trends with time. I can write this if you
want.} want.
Edit: I feel that there is a lot to add to this - this description just came from watching the video a couple of times.}
The simulation shows the gas cloud collpasing and the protostar forming at t=0.17Myr. The outflow begins to form immediately and is well extablished by t=0.22Myr with a significant mass of dense, high velocity gas. However, the outflow dissapates and by t=0.35Myr its structure is no longer visible. The free gas is low density and moving at a low velocity.
\section{Results}
\subsection{Excitation Temperature}
...
\begin{equation}
\bar T = \frac{ \Sigma \rho_i T_i }{\Sigma \rho_i}
\end{equation}
{\bf update if this is not what you
did} did - Edit this is slightly complicated as T average was actually really high, even when accounting for mass. However if you looked at a graph of the temperatures you saw two spikes - one somewhere between 100K - 1000K (which was low density gas) and another at ~10K. I took the average of this lower spike. Should I call of T_{avg} high density gas?}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c | c} \label{tab_texcit}