deletions | additions       diff --git a/ALMA config [1].tex b/ALMA config [1].tex  index 84607d5..7774f57 100644  --- a/ALMA config [1].tex  +++ b/ALMA config [1].tex 
...
\end{tabular}  \end{center}  We foundusing runs 16, 18 and 26  that changing the ALMA  configuration had a significant impact effect  on our results. \subsection{Mass}  While one may expect that arrays with a larger area and baseline would give better results, we We  found that this was not true. As much objects  of the outflow is extended, we need this size were best observed with ALMA configurations with  a larger large  beam. The beam is Figure (n?) shows the mass observed by  the most important parameter when observing using ALMA. The effect can be seen when comparing R14 Cycle 1.1 and 1.3 configurations. Configuration 1.3 with its large baseline and small beam was significantly less effective than configuration 1.1, with all other observational parameters kept constant (R14  and R17. R17).