this is for holding javascript data
Stella Offner edited why 12 gives good image but bad data.tex
about 10 years ago
Commit id: 16515bf7464854e6b03a86d3487eed9d68e2d4b8
deletions | additions
diff --git a/why 12 gives good image but bad data.tex b/why 12 gives good image but bad data.tex
index 9305d03..56a080f 100644
--- a/why 12 gives good image but bad data.tex
+++ b/why 12 gives good image but bad data.tex
...
To correct for the fact that \textsuperscript{12}CO is opticaly thick, we use the following equation:
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:mass-energy}
Tmb_12 T_{\rm mb 12} /
Tmb_13 T_{mb13} =
[12_CO] [^{12}{\rm CO}] /
[13_CO] [^{13}{\rm CO}] * (1 -
e ^ -tau_12) e^{-\tau_{12}) /
tau_12\end{equation} \tau_{12}
\end{equation}
taken from the Dunhan paper. This provides a correction for the optical depth of each \textsuperscript{12}CO voxel based on the \textsuperscript{13}CO equivalent voxel. Using this scaling, we obtained the following results.